Let me help you decipher what your perk-laden, high rolling expat compensation package really means...
Countless times since we have arrived I've been a bit envious of the wives of fellows working for big multinational corporations here in Brazil. Why? It seemed to me that these wives had endless resources at their disposal, not to mention an automatic, prepackaged group of new best friends (a.k.a. all the other "expat wives" or "trailing spouses").
Never having been a fan of big companies in the first place, I've since re-evaluated this situation for myself and am not as jealous anymore. (Except of course when I think about how my internet is not hooked up and how if my husband worked for a huge company they'd have a person whose whole job it was to make sure that this was taken care of for me.)
With the perks come disadvantages. Below are the details. (This post is really not Brazil-specific, much of this applies to ex-pats and their spouses working anywhere in the world.)
Supposed perk: "Safety" Training and "Cultural Awareness" Training.
Actual downside: Basically it sounds like they brainwash scare the s*%# out of these people upon arrival so that they deem themselves completely helpless and therefore are totally fine with all the restrictions they are about to put on them (see below... )
Although I admit I would not mind some self defense classes...
Supposed perk: Company-owned car and full time driver.
Actual downside: The driver tends to be a company employee. Meaning that his loyalty is always to his boss, the company (don't bite the hand that feeds!), which means that he has been specifically instructed on where he is and is not to take his passengers, which in a nutshell means that said expat wife's freedom is limited. As in: the driver dictates where they can and cannot go. For real.
IF the company allows its employees to drive these company-owned vehicles on occasion/weekends (and some do not!), rest assured the built-in GPS will monitor every place they go. One woman told me a story about how her husband's colleagues all watched on a computer as they got lost and went in circles on a recent excursion. Privacy? What's that?
(This brings up yet another reason I had pangs of envy - people at this company have time to fool around and do stuff like that? My husband has been working like a dog since we arrived.)
I have also talked to numerous people who said the company does not allow them to take taxi's or buses.
Most of the women I speak with who have full time drivers find that they are constantly waiting around for their drivers to pick them up (taking away the "convenience" factor significantly).
Supposed perk: Lots of time off to do what one pleases since the company won't employ them or help them get a work visa so that they can work elsewhere (see more on this below).
Actual downside: Forget the idea of volunteering or giving back, the company will deem most worthwhile volunteer opportunities as "too dangerous" and forbid them.
Supposed perk: A big group of new best friends aka the expat wives.
Actual downside: Now that the company controls one's whole existence (see above) it will also be the topic of one's entire social life.
The worst of all, inspiring this rant in the first place...
Many of the bigger companies will not help the trailing spouse acquire a working visa. In fact, we have some friends who recently left Brazil to seek greener pastures where both of them could work for the same company (before moving to Rio, they had both worked for the company that brought them to Brazil for over a decade. Only he was placed in a job when they moved here. Nice.) - not because they necessarily wanted to leave Brazil, but because of this and several other controls the company imposed on them which they did not feel the need to adjust to.
On the visa issue:
There is no way I would have wanted to be working the last three months, getting ourselves set up here has really been a full time job and I have been grateful that I did not have to work during this period of time.
That said, for a company to bring a family or couple to a foreign country and not provide the trailing spouse with the resources to acquire a working visa is absolutely a form of control in my opinion. Most of these women are told that they "can't" get a working visa (as in, that it is not possible). As far as I know, this is not true.
Disclaimer: I have been told that I eventually will get a working visa if I want one. I do not know if the same rules apply for American citizens as Canadian citizens?
To me, failing to help the trailing spouse obtain a work permit seems tactical on the company's part, much like encouraging employees to get mortgages or fancy cars, knowing they will be trapped into working forever to pay them off. Common sense, on the company's part. A single income family man will feel much more obligation to fulfill his employer's every whim to support his family. Not cool for the company to manipulate/create this situation for its employee.
Apparently, from a worldwide perspective, more opportunities are being created for trailing spouses. According to an article in the International Herald Tribune, legal barriers to working abroad are falling:
"France last year was the latest government to allow family members
of multinational employees and skilled workers to take a job without
obtaining a separate permit. Other countries - the Netherlands, Hong
Kong, Argentina, Singapore and the United States - have also loosened
restrictions."
The article also said that as more women enter the work force, more couples are refusing international assignments abroad if a spouse's job can't be transferred.
Companies addressing this issue have the right idea, long term. Why? According to the article and several surveys, spousal dissatisfaction is the number one reason for assignment failure abroad.
My final comments on the issue...
Visa issues aside, I realize that many of these restrictions and controls are put into place for legal reasons and for the intended safety of the employees and their families. Some of these policies are put into place after an unfortunate incident occurs, and are meant to protect people. However, it seems to have gotten a little out of control with some companies and is majorly interfering with the international experience some of these people are having. Believe me there have been times I wished there was someone, anyone, more concerned for my safety (as I wandered around on multiple occasions, lost, on foot, without even a cell phone, or a bank card that worked in this country, or having anyone who had a clue where I was... ) but my point is that even without these things, absolutely nothing bad has happened to me.
Not all big multinationals operating in Brazil impose such restrictions on employees. Large oil companies seem to have the most "policies" in place, but then the employees of large oil companies are probably the biggest targets as well. Our closest friends here in Brazil are here with a large multinational (not an oil and gas company) and have virtually no lifestyle restrictions. Nor do we, in our case it's because the company we are here with is too small to have any such policies in place (which has worked out well for us).
I figure that if I had children I would feel completely differently about this issue! I would want the armoured car, the driver who refuses to drive anywhere unsafe, the whole nine yards.
In closing, I just don't like the idea of a company controlling every aspect of its employee's life. Moving abroad makes everything revolve around "the company" enough, and I think some of these "perks" should be optional.
Recent Comments